Monthly Archives: March 2015

Jonathan Gibson on the difference between being “biblical” and “biblicist”

We suggest that articulating definite atonement is similar to articulating doctrines like the Trinity or the two natures of Christ. The approach needs to be biblical, but not biblicist. No one text “proves” definite atonement, any more than one text … Continue reading

Posted in Atonement, Biblical interpretation, Doctrine, Theological education | Leave a comment